[How chummy has Crissie been getting with his wax-strips? Well, take a gander...]It seems that things tend to go a bit raunchy round our parts once the weekend hits. Do excuse us.
This photo of
Cristiano and his extra-low riding shorts in Sardinia has been making its way around the internets for a few weeks now. We're not sure if its been shopped or not but it does give us a chance to bring up a truly slippery topic:
manscaping.
While this particular Crissie moment reveals that the shots we've been taking at his all-over body waxing may not be exactly, er, accurate (or at least the hair removal isn't
all-over in the literal sense), an intense aversion to body hair is quite prevalent among footballers.
[Z in Miami this winter. No arm hair. No leg hair. --Photo Thievery: Socialite's Life]Examples:
Cesc's arm hair is wont to disappear on occasion.
Lampsy's often spotted rocking the smooth underarm look.
Antonio Cassano gave us a not-at-all-needed look at his junk once and -- after we recovered -- we noticed
________. And of course, there are those
Beckham underwear
ads all of which are absolutely hairless.
So, have ya'll got beef with the baller manscaping? When is it crossing the line?
TIET Final Verdict: It's a case-by-case sort of thing on our end. In general though, if a man is more concerned with
any part of his grooming routine than his lady is, it's likely to be a turn-off.
[TY: Jeffry @ Nohandsball] Labels: ballers on the block, cristiano ronaldo
